South Korea's former President Yoon Suk Yeol jailed for 5 years

A South Korean judge sentenced former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday to five years in prison for obstructing justice and other crimes linked to his disastrous martial law declaration and in its chaotic aftermath.It is the first in a series of verdicts for the disgraced ex-leader, whose brief suspension of civilian rule in South Korea on December 3, 2024prompted massive protestsand a showdown in parliament.Now ousted from power, he faces multiple trials for actions taken during that debacle and in the turmoil that followed.On Friday, Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul's Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsAppBaek said that Yoon abused his power by turning officials of the Presidential Security Service against the state and used them as his "personal guards" serving his "own safety and private interests".Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

It is the first in a series of verdicts for the disgraced ex-leader, whose brief suspension of civilian rule in South Korea on December 3, 2024prompted massive protestsand a showdown in parliament.Now ousted from power, he faces multiple trials for actions taken during that debacle and in the turmoil that followed.On Friday, Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul's Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsAppBaek said that Yoon abused his power by turning officials of the Presidential Security Service against the state and used them as his "personal guards" serving his "own safety and private interests".Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Now ousted from power, he faces multiple trials for actions taken during that debacle and in the turmoil that followed.On Friday, Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul's Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsAppBaek said that Yoon abused his power by turning officials of the Presidential Security Service against the state and used them as his "personal guards" serving his "own safety and private interests".Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

On Friday, Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul's Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsAppBaek said that Yoon abused his power by turning officials of the Presidential Security Service against the state and used them as his "personal guards" serving his "own safety and private interests".Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Baek said that Yoon abused his power by turning officials of the Presidential Security Service against the state and used them as his "personal guards" serving his "own safety and private interests".Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members froma martial law planning meeting."Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

"Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the... Constitution," Baek said."The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

"The defendant's culpability is extremely grave," he said.But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.Supporters of South Korea's impeached former president Yoon Suk Yeol react as they watch a livestream of Yoon's trial in front of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul on January 16, 2026.[AFP]Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

After the verdict was announced, his supporters outside the court fell silent for several minutes before breaking into chants of "Yoon again!"Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon's lawyers said the verdict "simplifies the boundary between the exercise of a president's constitutional authority and criminal liability"."If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

"If this reasoning is allowed to stand, no future president will be able to act decisively in times of crisis," lawyer Yu Jeong-hwa told reporters.Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon defiantStay informed. Subscribe to our newsletterBy clicking on theSIGN UPbutton, you agree to ourTerms & Conditionsand thePrivacy PolicySIGN UPIt comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

It comes days after prosecutors ina separate casedemanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the "ringleader of an insurrection" in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.Stay Informed, Stay Empowered: Download the Standard ePaper App!They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown "no remorse" for actions that threatened "constitutional order and democracy".If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the "exercise of a president's constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection".He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an "unconstitutional dictatorship" through their control of the legislature."There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

"There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign."The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.Follow The Standard
channel
on WhatsApp

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special
offers!

Pick your favourite topics below for a tailor made homepage just for you